2. RESEARCH QUESTION
What is a good understanding of communicative language ability?
The understanding must be theoretically sound and simple enough to be a guideline for curriculum.
3. REVIEW
3.1 Descriptive approach
Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment.
Cliché:
“Professor, your talk is too abstract and too general. Make it more specific!”
The opposite truth:
“Listen, your talk is too particular and too specific. Make it more abstract!”
A good theoretical understanding is also needed.
3.2 Theoretical approach
Development from Chomsky (1965) up to Bachman & Palmer (1996)
Problems in Bachman & Palmer (1996)
Not interactive enough
Mysterious 'strategic competence'
Obliterated 'psychophysiological mechanisms'
keywords:applied linguistics, Arendt, communication, communicative language ability, critical applied linguistics (CALx), English language teaching (ELT), English as a second or foreign language, Exploratory Practice, linguistic communication, Luhmann, sociocultural approach,TEFL, TESL, philosophy, postmodern
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(33)
-
▼
September
(9)
- Wu Zongjie on words in practice
- A foreign language writer
- A three-dimensional understanding of communicative...
- A three-dimensional understanding of communicative...
- A three-dimensional understanding of communicative...
- A three-dimensional understanding of communicative...
- A three-dimensional understanding of communicative...
- A three-dimensional understanding of communicative...
- A three-dimensional understanding of communicative...
-
▼
September
(9)
Labels
- General (21)
- Critical Applied Linguistics (13)
- Theories of Linguistic Communication (10)
- TEFL (9)
- Exploratory Practice (8)
- Arendt (4)
- Sociocultural (2)
- Search (1)
0 コメント:
Post a Comment